Sunday, April 28, 2019

Open topic Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words - 1

Open topic - Essay ExampleDemocracies can either be direct or representation. In direct democracy, the public is allowed to directly participate in their government. In exemplar democracies, citizens are ever so allowed to elect representatives who impart represent them in the decision making processes. Despite be popular, democracy cannot be referred to as the best form of governance. This paper aims at proving that democracy has greatly failed as a form of governance. Democracy can be express to be faulty in the experience that it is a form of governance that it is ever so determined by what the majority wants and not what is good for the surface area. The interrogate here is what result happen in a situation where the majority is wrong. This will mean that whatsoever will fifty-fiftytually take place will not be the best thing for the country at large. The majority can always be wrong as a result of misinformation or being fed with completely wrong information by influ ential figures for their own selfish gain. This will definitely lead to a governance error that might haunt the country for decades affecting even generations that were not part of the faulty decision making (Diamond and Plattner 184). Democracy can also be said to be a highly expensive form of governance. There are a lot of visions that always go to literal waste during democratic processes. A country always spends a lot of gold just trying to make sure that democratic elections are always free, fair, and accurate. Despite all these efforts, at that place are always complaints about elections not being free and fair. This would raise the question of whether democracy is authentically governance by the people as is commonly referred to. Other resources also go to waste in the form of resources used during election campaigns. These resources are usually used for the purpose of influencing the choices of the public during political elections. The resource used during the political campaign would rather be used for other activities that are more much profitable and productive. In comparison to a monarchy form of governance, democracy would be definitely unreasonable expensive. antiauthoritarian processes can also be said to be faulted by baseless preferences of leaders. Democratic elections involve a battle for supremacy of races, ethnic groups, religions and many other forms of grouping. People will always vote for certain(prenominal) candidates on the basis of their ethnicity, race, religion, and not their capability to be good leaders. This leads to situations where the ethnic, racial, or religious groups with the highest number of citizens always carry the day. The obvious result of such an election is a government that lacks diligence and expertise. As much as one group might pride of being successful during the elections, the consequences of having incompetent leaders will be faced by the whole country( Adler and Weismann 221). Democracy can lead to the imbalanced development in a country. Since the leaders are always elected by the majority, they will always strive to those who voted for them at the expense of those who did not vote for them. For instance, if a leader was highly voted for in a certain region of the country and rejected in others, they will always tend to favor those who voted for them when it comes to developmental projects. This is mainly repayable to human nature, which makes it almost impossible for a person to respond to bad deeds with good ones. In the same manner, it will be

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.